- 帖子
- 29
|
600 - VISITOR
You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
You stated in your application that you intend to visit Australia for sightseeing.
You provided with your application a document purporting to be business license.
Our office has attempted to verify the authenticity of this document and has found it to be fraudulent. The fact that you have provided fraudulent documents in support of your application for a visa raises serious concerns as to the bona fides of your claim to be genuinely intending to enter Australia temporarily.
In light of the above considerations I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa would be granted. You therefore do not meet Subclause 600.211.
Decision
As you do not meet one or more clauses in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, I find that you do not meet the criteria for the grant of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa.
Therefore, I refuse your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa lodged at Shanghai.
Cathy Wang
Position Number: 60025907
Department of Immigration and Border Protection
21 December 2016
|
|