- 帖子
- 49
|
Reasons for Decision
Under migration law, an application is made for a class of visa and your application must be considered against the criteria for all subclasses within that visa class.
Your application has been considered against the criteria for the following subclasses within VISITOR visa class.
600 - VISITOR
You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
In assessing these criteria I have taken into account the information provided in your visa application form, as well as supporting documents relating to your personal and financial circumstances in China.
You stated in your application that you intend to visit Australia to sightseeing. I find that you have not demonstrated you have sufficiently strong financial, family, employment or other commitments in China that would be an incentive for you to return to China.
More specifically, while you claim to be employed in China
• your claimed income cannot be considered significant in the context of the likely costs of a temporary stay in Australia, or be considered to demonstrate an incentive to return to China after a trip to Australia.
• the only evidence of your financial capacity you have provided is a recently deposited bank deposit. I have attached little weight to this document as evidence of your financial means, as on its own, it does not sufficiently demonstrate your financial wherewithal.
I note that you have not previously travelled to Australia, that you appear to have little or no prior international travel. In summary, I have serious concerns that your own intention in travelling to Australia may be to apply for permanent residency.
On balance, I am not satisfied that you have sufficiently demonstrated an incentive to return to China that outweighs the concerns detailed above. I am therefore not satisfied that that you genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated. I therefore find that you do not satisfy subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations.
Decision
As you do not meet one or more clauses in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, I find that you do not meet the criteria for the grant of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa.
Therefore, I refuse your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa lodged at Shanghai.
|
|
