- 帖子
- 70
|
Notification of the refusal of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600 ) visa.
This letter refers to your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa, which was lodged at Shanghai on 16 August 2016.
I wish to advise that the application for this visa has been refused for the following applicant(s):
Zi LIN
After careful consideration of all the information you have provided, I was not satisfied that you met the relevant criteria for the grant of this visa as set out in Australian migration law.
The attached Decision Record provides more detailed information about this decision and the applicant(s) it applies to.
Review Rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.
Visa Application Charge
The visa application charge which has already been paid was for the processing of the application and it must be paid regardless of the application outcome. There are only limited circumstances in which refunds can be given.
Questions About this Decision
No further assessment of this visa application can be taken at this office. However, if you have questions about this decision, or the process or information that was taken into account, you can contact this office.
Yours sincerely
Jack Hu
Position Number: 60021302
Department of Immigration and Border Protection
Details of Application
Application ID IRIS 08440437301
Visa Class VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600)
Visa Type Temporary
Application Lodgement Date 16 August 2016
File Number 01686030
Payment Receipt Number 170000028970
Information Considered
I am a delegated decision maker under Section 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). In reaching my decision, I have considered the following:
relevant legislation contained in the Act and Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) collectively “migration law”;
information contained in the department's Procedures Advice Manual 3; documents and information provided by the applicant(s); and other relevant information held on departmental files.
Reasons for Decision
Under migration law, an application is made for a class of visa and your application must be considered against the criteria for all subclasses within that visa class.
Your application has been considered against the criteria for the following subclasses within VISITOR visa class.
600 - VISITOR
You did not satisfy clause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and (b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
You claimed to visit Australia for travel and photography purposes in your application.
I am not satisfied you have sufficiently demonstrated that you intend only to visit Australia temporarily.
In assessing whether or not the applicant intends to stay temporarily in Australia for a purpose for which the visa is granted I have taken into account the information provided in the application and supporting documents relating to your personal circumstances, commitments, incentive to return home, financial situation and the ability to support yourself while in Australia. I have also considered the information obtained during relevant telephone interviews conducted on 18 August 2016, as well as the relevant visa history of the applicants concerned in this application.
Most importantly, you claim in your job reference letter to be the general manager of Beijing Zhongfu Communications Engineering Co SH Branch Co. I note that your adult travel companions have all claimed to be the general manager of the company and that your pension contribution account shows a limited sum of less than 10,000 yuan in 52 months, which for one month was paid by another company. I further note that, despite the evidence on the operation of the company you provided in the application, there is little publicly available information to demonstrate the company is running well. Having considered all the available information, I have concerns on your employment circumstances and your claimed intention to travel to Australia for travelling purposes only.
On balance, I am not satisfied that you have sufficiently demonstrated an incentive to return to China that outweighs the concerns detailed above. I am therefore not satisfied that that you genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated. I therefore find that you do not satisfy subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations.
Decision
As you do not meet one or more clauses in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, I find that you do not meet the criteria for the grant of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa.
Therefore, I refuse your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa lodged at Shanghai.
Jack Hu
Position Number: 60021302
Department of Immigration and Border Protection
顺便问下保单怎么退保啊？研究半天找不到。 |
|
亏了好多钱这次，房车机票···哇靠···没想到还是拒签···
。。。不然换个国家申请吧！