- 帖子
- 50
|
712-3202 RONGKECHENG JIANGAN DIST
WUHAN HUBEI SHENG CHINA
In reply quote:
Client Name Xia SHENG
Date of Birth 25 December 1978
Date of Visa Application 15 May 2018
Application ID 1455613464
Transaction Reference Number EGOI84BPKJ
File Number BCC2018/3777944
Visa Application Charge Receipt Number 9009059923
Transmission Method Email sent to 2093813923@qq.com
Dear Xia SHENG
Notification of refusal of application for a Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600) visa
Refused Applicant
I wish to advise you that the application for this visa has been refused on 06 July 2018 for the
following applicant:
Client Name Xia SHENG
Date of Birth 25 December 1978
The applicant did not satisfy the provisions of the Migration Regulations 1994.
Decision
I am a delegated decision maker under section 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). In
reaching my decision, I have considered relevant legislation contained in the Act and the
Migration Regulations 1994 and information contained in the department’s policy guidelines
Procedures Advice Manual 3.
Under the migration law, a visa cannot be granted unless the applicant meets the relevant
legal requirements that are specified in the Act and the Regulations. Your application has
been considered against the criteria for a subclass 600 visa in the Visitor visa class.
As you do not meet one or more clauses in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, I find that you do
not meet the criteria for the grant of a subclass 600 visa in the Visitor visa class. Therefore, I
refuse your application for a Visitor visa.
回复 引用 编辑 返回顶部
sarahsheng
中级会员
帖子12
8#
发表于 昨天 20:33 |只看该作者
Reasons for decision
You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the
visa is granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
Under policy when considering “any other relevant matter”, decision makers may take
into account a wide range of considerations to determine whether an applicant genuinely
intends a temporary stay in Australia. This may include, but is not limited to, the applicant’s
employment, economic and family circumstances, their credibility, the claimed purpose and
period of stay, and the applicant’s previous travel history.
In assessing these criteria I have taken into account the information provided in your visa
application form and the supporting documents provided. On balance, I find that you have
not demonstrated sufficiently strong employment, economic, family or other commitments in
China that would be sufficient incentive for you to return to China.
More specifically, while you claim to be employed in China, you have not provided sufficient
evidence with your application of a regular salary payment that supports your income and
employment claims. This leads me to have doubts as to your ongoing employment and
overall economic circumstances in China. As such, I do not consider that you have strong
employment or economic incentives to return China at the end of your proposed stay in
Australia.
In light of the above considerations, I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay
temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated, and therefore find that you do not
satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994.
Review rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.
As this letter was sent to you by email, you are taken to have received it at the end of the day
it was transmitted.
Questions about this decision
We cannot consider your visa application any further.
Visa application charge
The visa application charge which has already been paid can only be refunded in limited
circumstances, regardless of the application outcome.
|
|
