求助！21号电调，至今无信，是否按惯例就已被拒签

vicky6869

求助！4月19号送签广州使领馆，21号中午电调，至今没消息，是否按惯例就已经被拒签了？只是拒签信还在路上？

我和老公及妹妹一行三人一年前就买了亚航的促销机票，经过这二个月在网上奋战看攻略自已制定了行程计划，也购买了保险，预定了部分酒店。昨天中午我和妹妹二人接到了电调，我们提供的材料均真实，电调回答的内容也真实，只是我在回答签证官测试我的英语水平时表现的不理想，毕竟我们是80年代的大学生，所学的英语是哑巴英语，只会略看一点不会听。问到行程里具体到某一个景点要如何去时我回答的不准确，因为功课做的只是一个大体游玩方向，没有细到具体乘坐什么样的交通工具前往景点这种后期的工作。总之我对电调的功课做的不足，基本上是随性回答的，但都是真实的，是不是因为电调这二点就把我们拒了？

另外，老公有稳定的工作和固定的工资流水。我是职业股民，打了三个月的交割单，厚厚的一叠。不过在10年前因为白本单身或者别的原因我被澳电调拒签过一次，老公和妹妹不是白本，但也只是跟我去一些东南亚的纪录。妹妹在广州有工作但工资发的是现金 ，这一点我们在工作证明中有说明，电调时也解释了。

昨天下午在煎熬中一直在等邮件，都无心操作股票，晚上实在无法入睡，于是半夜给网站上提供的邮箱info.aucan
info.aucan@vfshelpline.com
写了封邮件，不知能不能转给签证官看，是否还有用？

vicky6869

着急啊，待求助中......怎么一个小时过去了还不给审核呀？本论坛首帖发出去咋要这么久呢？

小丸子

vicky6869 发表于 2016-4-22 13:40
着急啊，待求助中......怎么一个小时过去了还不给审核呀？本论坛首帖发出去咋要这么久呢？ ...

一般电调完1-2天就出结果了。你提供在1419表格上的邮箱有查看么？

vicky6869

回复 小丸子 的帖子

查啦，无时无刻都在查，连垃圾邮件箱都不放过

表叫我名字

我电调了三次，在第三次电调结束后的第二天中午才收到的签证，我觉得没有马上收到拒签信，基本上就是还在进一步核对部分信息，只要资料真实就OK

vicky6869

回复 表叫我名字 的帖子

哦，那我就放点心了，资料都真实，行程单和机票都是我自已弄的。就是回答电话中的部分问题时人不在状态，表现不好，怕因此被拒。你被电调了三次，那得多煎熬啊！真不容易

小丸子

表叫我名字 发表于 2016-4-23 15:07
我电调了三次，在第三次电调结束后的第二天中午才收到的签证，我觉得没有马上收到拒签信，基本上就是还在进 ...

电调了三次。。。间隔多久啊

vicky6869

同问……我们既没有接到第二次电调，也没有出签与否的结果，3天过去了

vicky6869

五天过去了......既没有接到第二次的电调，也没有出签与否的结果。实在熬不住了，刚打电话过去签证中心，说是还处在申理状态，磨人啊！

小丸子

vicky6869 发表于 2016-4-26 16:59
五天过去了......既没有接到第二次的电调，也没有出签与否的结果。实在熬不住了，刚打电话过去签证中心，说 ...

10年前被拒过，可能使馆这次审核会就格外慎重吧。。。可能有这个原因。。

vicky6869

回复 小丸子 的帖子

谢谢可爱的小丸子的耐心回复和陪伴昨天终于获签了！真是好事多磨，磨人呢!

vicky6869

丸子大人，今天居然发现三个人当中还有一个人是拒签没过的，我还以为三个人要过一起过，要否一起否呢，哪知我妹妹被拒了，以下是她的拒签信，帮忙看看问题出在哪里？

vicky6869

Notification of the refusal of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600 ) visa.

This letter refers to your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa, which was lodged at Guangzhou on 20 April 2016.

I wish to advise that the application for this visa has been refused for the following applicant(s):

Jing WU

After careful consideration of all the information you have provided, I was not satisfied that you met the relevant criteria for the grant of this visa as set out in Australian migration law.

The attached Decision Record provides more detailed information about this decision and the applicant(s) it applies to.

Review Rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.

Visa Application Charge
The visa application charge which has already been paid was for the processing of the application and it must be paid regardless of the application outcome. There are only limited circumstances in which refunds can be given.

Questions About this Decision
No further assessment of this visa application can be taken at this office. However, if you have questions about this decision, or the process or information that was taken into account, you can contact this office.

Contacting the Department
You can contact us with a general enquiry in a number of ways including by email, through our website, by telephone through our Service Centres or offices around the world, or in person. In Australia you can call 13 18 81 between 8:30 am and 4:30 pm Monday to Friday. Details on contacting our offices outside Australia are available on our website at www.border.gov.au

Yours sincerely




Department of Immigration and Border Protection

vicky6869

Information Considered
I am a delegated decision maker under Section 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). In reaching my decision, I have considered the following:
•        relevant legislation contained in the Act and Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) collectively “migration law”;
•        information contained in the department's Procedures Advice Manual 3;
•        documents and information provided by the applicant(s); and
•        other relevant information held on departmental files.

Reasons for Decision
Under migration law, an application is made for a class of visa and your application must be considered against the criteria for all subclasses within that visa class.

Your application has been considered against the criteria for the following subclasses within VISITOR visa class.

600 - VISITOR

You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
“The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to:
(a)        whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to   
which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b)        whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the  
Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and
               (c) any other relevant matter.”


Before a visa can be issued, applicants must demonstrate strong financial, employment and/ or personal ties which would demonstrate their incentive to abide by the conditions of that visa, and depart Australia at the end of their authorised temporary stay. I am not satisfied that you have provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate such ties.


You have provided insufficient evidence that you are receiving a regular income. Therefore, I do not consider that you have demonstrated that there is a strong financial incentive for you to comply with your visa conditions and to depart Australia within the validity of your visa.



Decision
As you do not meet one or more clauses in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, I find that you do not meet the criteria for the grant of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa.

Therefore, I refuse your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa lodged at Guangzhou.

aim

你们三人行。三人中含你们夫妻两人以及你丈夫的妹妹。先不谈其他，按这情形，你们的住宿如何安排和预定的？递交签证申请中是否有预定的住宿单？