- 帖子
- 17
|
回复 小丸子 的帖子
我工作8年了，去年初换的工作刚满一年，平时工资发的是现金，平时发的工资金直接存定期了，所以，我的活期流水都不是按时汇入的，5万块有一部分是2015.1月份陆续汇入的, 以下是拒签信，麻烦给下意见
After careful consideration of all the information you have provided, I was not satisfied that you met the relevant criteria for the grant of this visa as set out in Australian migration law.
The attached Decision Record provides more detailed information about this decision and the applicant(s) it applies to.
Review Rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.
Visa Application Charge
The visa application charge which has already been paid was for the processing of the application and it must be paid regardless of the application outcome. There are only limited circumstances in which refunds can be given.
Questions About this Decision
No further assessment of this visa application can be taken at this office. However, if you have questions about this decision, or the process or information that was taken into account, you can contact this office.
Contacting the Department
You can contact us with a general enquiry in a number of ways including by email, through our website, by telephone through our Service Centres or offices around the world, or in person. In Australia you can call 13 18 81 between 8:30 am and 4:30 pm Monday to Friday. Details on contacting our offices outside Australia are available on our website at www.border.gov.au
Yours sincerely
Rosa
Visa Officer
Position Number: 60032063
Department of Immigration and Border Protection
Application Lodgement Date 29 March 2016
File Number 03377409
Payment Receipt Number 170000019349
Information Considered
I am a delegated decision maker under Section 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). In reaching my decision, I have considered the following:
·relevant legislation contained in the Act and Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) collectively “migration law”;
·information contained in the department's Procedures Advice Manual 3;
·documents and information provided by the applicant(s); and
·other relevant information held on departmental files.
Reasons for Decision
Under migration law, an application is made for a class of visa and your application must be considered against the criteria for all subclasses within that visa class.
Your application has been considered against the criteria for the following subclasses within VISITOR visa class.
600 - VISITOR
You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
“The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to:
(a)whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to
which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b)whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the
Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.”
Before a visa can be issued, applicants must demonstrate strong financial, employment and/ or personal ties which would demonstrate their incentive to abide by the conditions of that visa, and depart Australia at the end of their authorised temporary stay. I am not satisfied that you have provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate such ties.
You have provided insufficient evidence that you are receiving a regular income / pension. Therefore, I do not consider that you have demonstrated that there is a strong financial incentive for you to comply with your visa conditions and to depart Australia within the validity of your visa.
Decision
As you do not meet one or more clauses in Schedule 2 of the Regulations, I find that you do not meet the criteria for the grant of a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa.
Therefore, I refuse your application for a VISITOR (Class FA) VISITOR (Subclass 600) visa lodged at Guangzhou.
Rosa
Visa Officer
Position Number: 60032063
Department of Immigration and Border Protection
30 March 2016 |
|
