快递到上海，3天收到邮件被拒签。 爸妈两人都去过很多国家，签过申根，英国，俄罗斯，日本等。。。觉的很气愤。 求指点！
妹妹在澳洲留学，但是行程安排（我打自己做了个行程表格）中并没有涉及到看她，但是签证官的拒签信中居然说打算拜访女儿，不知道他在哪里得出的结论。
妈妈的拒签原因：
在评估这些标准时，我已考虑到您的签证申请表中提供的资料，以及有关您个人和经济情况的支持文件。 你在你的申请中说，你打算去澳大利亚拜访你在澳大利亚学习的女儿。我发现你没有表现出你有足够的资金，家庭，就业或其他承诺，在中国，这将是一个激励你返回中国。 更具体地说，在中国，你没有提供足够的证据来证明你的申请，比如最近的税收收入或是支持你的收入和就业要求的定期工资支付的证据。
在以上的考虑，我是不满意的，你真的打算暂时在澳大利亚为您所说的目的，并因此发现你不满足第600.211的移民法规1994。
In assessing these criteria I have taken into account the information provided in your visa application form, as well as supporting documents relating to your personal and financial circumstances in China. You stated in your application that you intend to visit Australia to visit your daughter who is studying in Australia. I find that you have not demonstrated you have sufficiently strong financial, family, employment or other commitments in China that would be an incentive for you to return to China. More specifically, while you claim to be employed in China you have not provided sufficient evidence with your application, such as recent taxation receipts or evidence of a regular salary payment that supports your income and employment claims. In light of the above considerations, I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated, and therefore find that you do not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994.
爸爸的拒签原因：
你在你的申请中提到你打算去澳大利亚旅游。我发现你没有表现出你有足够的资金，家庭，就业或其他承诺，在中国，这将是一个激励你返回中国。我还发现，你还没有提供足够的细节，你的旅行目的在澳大利亚，这是足够的，以满足我，你打算暂时留在澳大利亚的目的，该签证是理所当然的。我已经评估了您所提供的签证申请，并已经进行了验证的存在，企业和业务关系的要求，使用第三方检查。虽然你声称在中国工作，你没有提供足够的证据，你的申请，如最近的税收收入或定期支付的证据，支持你的收入和就业要求。 在以上的考虑，我是不满意的，你真的打算暂时在澳大利亚为您所说的目的，并因此发现你不满足第600.211的移民法规1994。
You stated in your application that you intend to visit Australia for tourism. I find that you have not demonstrated you have sufficiently strong financial, family, employment or other commitments in China that would be an incentive for you to return to China. I also find that you have not provided sufficient detail about your travel purpose in Australia that is sufficient to satisfy me that you are intending to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted. I have assessed the information you have provided with the visa application, and have undertaken to verify the existence of businesses and business relationship claims using third party checks. While you claim to be employed in China, you have not provided sufficient evidence with your application, such as recent taxation receipts or evidence of a regular salary payment that supports your income and employment claims. In light of the above considerations, I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated, and therefore find that you do not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994.
求各位指点，申根和英国也都是自己diy的都没问题啊。 | 
