- 帖子
- 11
|
以下是拒签的理由：
Reasons for decision
You did not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994, which reads that:
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the
visa is granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
Under policy when considering “any other relevant matter”, decision makers may take
into account a wide range of considerations to determine whether an applicant genuinely
intends a temporary stay in Australia. This may include, but is not limited to, the applicant’s
employment, economic and family circumstances, their credibility, the claimed purpose and
period of stay, and the applicant’s previous travel history.
In assessing these criteria I have taken into account the information provided in your visa
application form and the supporting documents provided. On balance, I find that you have
not demonstrated sufficiently strong employment, economic, family or other commitments in
China that would be sufficient incentive for you to return to China.
More specifically, I have considered your economic circumstances and note that you have
provided some evidence of your financial standing, however the amounts/assets cannot be
considered significant in the context of overall economic/employment conditions and cost of
living in China. As such, I do not consider that you have strong economic incentives to return
China at the end of your proposed stay in Australia.
I do not consider your stated employment circumstances to be strong evidence that you are
a genuine visitor with a commitment to abide by the conditions of your visa and to depart
Australia within visa validity.
In light of the above considerations, I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay
temporarily in Australia for the purpose you have stated, and therefore find that you do not
satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the Migration Regulations 1994. |
|
，没有电调。第一次真是太天真了，与表哥不是直系亲属，他的担保没有用，太过依赖他的担保，没有上传对我有利的资料，我很懊悔，也请大家不要再吐槽我
虽然我心中隐约有预感，但又有些不甘心，感觉我的资料没什么问题，是不是死在电调上了？
。我朋友10月初提交了，过两天无电调就出签了……