关于父母不随行同意函
大家好！想咨询一下，我是单亲妈妈，想带上2岁女儿和整个家族一齐去珀斯玩，但是用尽了所有方法都无法联系上前夫，更别说取得父母不随行同意函的签名了。离婚协议有注明女儿抚养权归我并改随我姓，男方不支付任何抚养费，而且自离婚后，男方没有任何联系，完全没有看望过女儿。求助大家，这种情况应该怎么办呀？请大家支个招吧~先谢谢大家了！提供离婚协议，自己写一个说明，把这个情况写清楚提交。 [b]回复 [url=forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&pid=242958&ptid=68412][color=Olive]小丸子[/color] 的帖子[/url][/b]
用中文写就可以了吗？ 中文就可以哈。 [b]回复 [url=forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&pid=242980&ptid=68412][color=Olive]小丸子[/color] 的帖子[/url][/b]
谢谢丸子大人！16号建GROUP和父母及女儿一齐提交，18号父母的成功出签，我和女儿的至今未有消息~请问丸子大人，有必要将我父母的出签信上传吗？
另外，系统上的状态栏，我女儿的名字显示是曾用名，但是details里面的applicants就是现用名，这种情况需要联系领事馆修改吗？
可以将父母准签信上传。
一个组，先后出签很正常哈。
只要最后出签的信息是现用名就没问题。 [b]回复 [url=forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&pid=243272&ptid=68412][color=Olive]小丸子[/color] 的帖子[/url][/b]
[font=微软雅黑][size=2]历经18天，我的签证终于在简短的电调后获批了，大喜！[/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]可是过了几分钟，我女儿的拒签信就来了，大悲！[/size][/font]
[font=微软雅黑][size=2]“According to the laws of the People’s Republic of China, both natural parents have lawful [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]responsibility regarding where their child may live. This lawful responsibility remains in effect [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]even after divorce/separation of the parents, or if the parents were never married.[/size][/font]
[font=微软雅黑][size=2]You claim to be travelling to Australia with your mother. Your mother submitted a divorce [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]certificate of your parents. She also claimed that your father is not involved in your [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]upbringing, and she is not in any contact with him, and therefore she has the sole right to [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]determine where you can live or travel.[/size][/font]
[font=微软雅黑][size=2]According to the laws of the People[/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]’s [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]Republic of China, the sole circumstance that one [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]parent can decide alone to bring a child abroad is that the other parent is dead, declared to [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]be missing, has lost capacity of civil conduct or has been revoked custody by law.The only [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]acceptable evidence that custody has been revoked by law is a decision by the People[/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]’s [/size][/font][font=微软雅黑][size=2]Court.”[/size][/font]
[font=微软雅黑][size=2]丸子大人，这种情况是无可挽回了吗？邮件正文里的“[color=#000]We prefer contact with this office concerning your application to be by email. We try to respond to all email enquiries within seven working days. You can email us on [email]Shanghai.TempEntry@dfat.gov.au[/email]”这段话也没有实际意义了吧？[/color][/size][/font]
[font=微软雅黑][size=2]这是意味着我女儿在18岁前都不能去澳洲了吗......[/size][/font]
看来今年真的很严。照这封信的意思是：根据中国法律，除非父母一方死亡，失踪，失去民事行为能力或者被撤销对孩子的监护权，另一方才有独自做主的权利带孩子出国。 [b]回复 [url=forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&pid=243435&ptid=68412][color=Olive]小丸子[/color] 的帖子[/url][/b]
丸子大人你觉得有二签的必要性吗？ 照这封信的意思是，如果不属于上述情况，就必须出具另一方父母的授权，不然没法签出。。
页:
[1]